The Future of Smelting & Steelmaking:

Trends Shaping a Greener, Smarter Industry


Steel has been the backbone of industrial progress for over 150 years. It is the invisible framework behind our skyscrapers, bridges, transport systems, and modern cities. But the industry that gave us the Industrial Revolution is now facing one of the greatest transitions in its history. The combined pressures of climate change, regulatory scrutiny, fluctuating energy costs, and global trade realignments are forcing steelmakers to rethink how steel is made, used, and traded.

Recent news reports show a fascinating picture: a sector in the middle of transformation, experimenting with new technologies like hydrogen-based direct reduction, while still relying on traditional blast furnace smelting to meet soaring demand. In this article, we explore the future direction of the smelting and steelmaking industry, what challenges lie ahead, and where the biggest opportunities are likely to emerge.


The Push for Green Steel

Hydrogen & Direct Reduced Iron (DRI): A Pathway to Decarbonization

Hydrogen-based steel production remains the single most promising pathway for deep decarbonization in the steel sector. Instead of using metallurgical coal and coke to chemically reduce iron ore, hydrogen can be used to produce direct reduced iron (DRI) that can then be melted in an electric arc furnace (EAF). This dramatically cuts CO₂ emissions, especially if the hydrogen is produced using renewable energy.

Projects like Salzgitter’s Salcos program in Germany are leading the way. Salzgitter has been developing one of the most ambitious hydrogen-based steel transformation roadmaps in Europe, gradually phasing in hydrogen reduction units and retiring carbon-intensive blast furnaces. Similarly, Australia’s NeoSmelt initiative, backed by Rio Tinto and ARENA, is exploring a combination of DRI and electric smelting furnaces to create a pathway that works for Australian ore quality and energy markets.

But this transition is anything but smooth. Salzgitter has recently delayed later stages of its program, citing economic and regulatory headwinds, such as the high cost of hydrogen, uncertain carbon pricing, and the slow rollout of renewable energy infrastructure. This highlights a hard truth: the green transition will not be instant or cheap. The next decade will likely be defined by pilot projects, incremental scale-ups, and careful balancing between economic viability and climate commitments.


The Coal Paradox

Even as green steel makes headlines, metallurgical coal is seeing a surprising resurgence. Demand for coal-based blast furnace production remains robust, especially in China and India, where domestic infrastructure spending continues to grow. In fact, recent research from the Global Energy Monitor shows that coal-based capacity is still expanding, even as global climate targets call for steep reductions in emissions.

This paradox points to the transitional nature of the current era. For the foreseeable future, the world will be living in a dual-track steel economy: one track relying on traditional blast furnaces and coke ovens to meet near-term demand, and another experimenting with hydrogen, electric smelting, and alternative reduction technologies.

For businesses, this means they cannot simply abandon existing capacity overnight. Instead, expect to see retrofit investments to improve the efficiency of blast furnaces, capture more waste heat, and install carbon capture and storage (CCS) where feasible. This “cleaner coal” approach will act as a bridge until low-carbon technologies can compete at scale on cost and availability.


Regional Shifts & Strategic Investments

Australia’s Green Steel Ambitions

Australia is emerging as a key player in the global conversation on sustainable steelmaking. The country has vast high-grade iron ore resources, growing renewable energy capacity, and a strategic interest in maintaining domestic steelmaking capability.

  • BlueScope’s $1.15B blast furnace reline at Port Kembla is one of the largest industrial projects in the nation’s history, designed to keep steel production secure for another 20 years. This investment shows that Australia is taking a pragmatic approach — continuing to support blast furnace technology while planning for a green future.
  • The NeoSmelt project, which just secured nearly $20M in government funding, is a potential game-changer. It will explore how to combine renewable-powered hydrogen and electric furnaces to make a commercial-scale green steel process that works with Australian ore.
  • The potential takeover of Whyalla Steelworks by a consortium led by BlueScope could turn the plant into a testbed for low-emissions ironmaking, providing a national blueprint for decarbonizing heavy industry.

Global Trade & Policy Realignment

Meanwhile, trade policy is also shaping the future. The EU and U.S. have resumed talks to revisit steel and aluminium tariffs, with a focus on creating carbon-based trade measures. If implemented, this could reward producers who adopt low-carbon technologies while penalizing those that rely on high-emission processes. For global producers, this will accelerate investment in low-emissions capacity to stay competitive in export markets.


Innovation Beyond Furnaces

The transformation of steelmaking is not just about switching fuels — it’s about reimagining the entire production system.

  • Modular, low-emission smelting plants like those being developed in Western Australia by Metal Logic allow companies to build capacity closer to demand centers, reduce transport emissions, and scale production up or down as needed.
  • Digital twins and AI-driven process control are making smelting more efficient. By modeling every step of the steelmaking process, producers can optimize energy use, reduce material losses, and increase yield — all of which improve profitability and lower emissions simultaneously.
  • Circular economy practices, such as increased use of scrap steel in EAFs, are becoming a central strategy. Recycling steel uses a fraction of the energy required to make virgin steel and fits neatly into the industry’s sustainability narrative.

This convergence of physical and digital innovation will likely create a new generation of steel plants that are smaller, smarter, and cleaner than their 20th-century predecessors.


Where the Industry is Headed

Looking ahead, the future of smelting and steelmaking will be defined by hybridization, regulation, and resilience:

  • Hybrid production systems will dominate for at least the next decade. Expect blast furnaces to operate alongside hydrogen-based DRI units and electric smelters as companies transition gradually.
  • Stricter carbon regulations will push companies to adopt low-carbon pathways faster than market forces alone would dictate. Carbon border adjustment mechanisms (CBAMs) will effectively tax “dirty steel” in major economies, making investment in green capacity a competitive necessity.
  • Domestic capability building will remain critical. The COVID-era supply chain crises reminded governments why domestic production matters. Expect to see policies that support keeping steelmaking onshore, even if that requires subsidies or preferential procurement.
  • Collaborative innovation will become the norm. Mining giants, energy producers, and technology firms are already forming alliances to solve the “green steel puzzle.” This cross-industry collaboration will unlock new efficiencies and accelerate commercialization.

Final Thoughts

The smelting and steelmaking industry is standing at the crossroads of history. The coming years will test its ability to balance sustainability with profitability, scale with flexibility, and tradition with innovation.

Companies that embrace this challenge — investing in low-carbon technology, digital transformation, and strategic partnerships — will not just survive the coming disruption but thrive as leaders in a new, greener industrial age. Steel may be one of the oldest materials in human civilization, but its future is being forged right now, and it has never been more exciting.

References

Salzgitter Salcos Project

Global Energy Monitor – Steel Sector Reports

ARENA NeoSmelt Funding Announcement

Challenges in the Australian Smelting Industry

Transforming Projects with 3D Scanning in Sydney

3D Lidar Scanning in Sydney

Sydney’s construction and engineering sectors are evolving fast — and 3D laser scanning is at the heart of this transformation. Whether you’re upgrading an industrial plant, planning a new commercial development, or managing complex infrastructure projects, having an accurate digital representation of your site is crucial.

3D scanning in Sydney delivers millimetre-precise point clouds that eliminate guesswork, reduce rework, and streamline project timelines. By capturing every detail — from structural steel to pipework — in a single, high-resolution scan, project teams can make faster, smarter decisions.

3D Scanning Sydney

At Hamilton by Design, we provide professional 3D laser scanning services across Sydney, helping engineers, architects, and builders create reliable as-built models, detect potential clashes before construction begins, and improve overall project efficiency.

This intro does three important things:
– Localizes the service by highlighting Sydney projects.
– Uses your primary keyword (“3D scanning Sydney”) naturally for SEO.
– Sets up the value proposition — accuracy, time savings, risk reduction — encouraging readers to keep reading.

Would you like me to also write two or three follow-up paragraphs to turn this into a standalone blog article specifically for Sydney, including local case study examples or industry use cases (e.g., infrastructure upgrades, commercial builds, heritage sites)? This would help it rank for long-tail search queries like “3D scanning services Sydney for construction”.

For more info Hamilton By Design

3d Scanning Sydney

Lidar Scanning Sydney | Point Cloud Scanning Sydney | 3D Modeling Sydney

Are You Getting the Full Value from Your Point Cloud Data?

 

3D Scanning

The world of manufacturing and fabrication is moving faster than ever. Point cloud scanning and 3D modeling have made it easier to capture reality with incredible accuracy — but simply collecting data isn’t enough.

Without the right expertise, point clouds often sit unused, underutilized, or worse — lead to costly mistakes when converted into incomplete or inaccurate drawings.

3D Scanning

That’s why mechanical engineering consultants are becoming essential partners for forward-thinking businesses. They don’t just process point clouds — they turn them into:

  • High-precision 3D models that match real-world conditions

  • Fabrication-ready drawings that reduce errors and rework

  • Actionable insights that save time, money, and frustration

This is no longer just about technology — it’s about strategy and execution.

Read our full article to discover why now is the perfect time to engage consultants who can unlock the power of your point cloud data:


It’s Time to Level Up: Why Mechanical Engineering Consultants Are Key to Unlocking the Power of Point Cloud to 3D Modeling

Engineering hashtagManufacturing hashtagPointCloud hashtag3DModeling hashtagFabrication hashtagDigitalTwin hashtagMechanicalEngineering hashtagIndustry40 hashtagInnovation

Chute Design at Hamilton By Design

 

At Hamilton by Design, we see ourselves as more than engineers — we are problem-solvers who bring both science and experience to the table. Every bulk material transfer is unique, and each one carries its own challenges. By combining the principles of particle physics with decades of hands-on site experience, we design chutes and transfer points that perform in the real world, not just on a computer screen.

Materials Handling

We are a small, specialised company, not a large corporate machine. That means you deal directly with the people who understand your operation, your materials, and your challenges. We take pride in our ability to stand on-site, watch the flow of material, and recognise behaviours that only years of experience can teach. This gives us the clarity to engineer practical solutions that keep your plant running reliably.

For us, your success is our success. We measure our achievement not by the number of projects we complete, but by the value we add to your operation — less dust, less wear, fewer stoppages, more tonnes moved.

Learn more about our approach and solutions Hamilton By Design – Chute Design

Mechanical
Engineering
| Structural
Engineering

Mechanical
Drafting
| Structural
Drafting

3D
Laser Scanning
| 3D
CAD Modelling
| 3D
Scanning

SolidWorks
Contractors in Australia

Hamilton By Design – Blog

Consulting Engineers

About Us –
Hamilton By Design

Designing for Developing Hazards: Lessons from the Derrimut Crane Collapse

Designing for Developing Hazards

Crane accidents are among the most visible reminders of the risks inherent in construction. The collapse of a crane at a data centre site in Derrimut, Melbourne, brought attention once again to the vulnerability of temporary lifting structures. While formal investigations are still underway, and no conclusions should be drawn prematurely, the event provides a valuable opportunity for reflection within the engineering community.

This article considers the collapse not as an isolated failure but as a case study in hazard identification. In particular, it highlights how mechanical engineers must adapt from a static, design-phase view of risk to a dynamic, real-time approach to hazard monitoring. Wind, soil stability, and load conditions are well-known hazards. But with modern tools — including LiDAR scanning for obstacle detection — engineers can move toward a future where developing hazards are continuously tracked, anticipated, and controlled.


From Hazard Identification to Live Hazard Monitoring

Hazard identification has traditionally been a design-phase process: engineers anticipate risks, apply safety factors, and create conservative margins. This remains essential. Yet the Derrimut collapse illustrates the limits of a static model in a dynamic environment.

Cranes are exposed to evolving hazards:

  • Wind gusts that change minute by minute.

  • Soil stability that shifts with rainfall, excavation, or groundwater.

  • Obstacles such as power lines or nearby structures, which can create cascading risks if struck.

  • Load dynamics, including swinging or sudden movement.

What is needed is a transition from hazard identification to hazard monitoring: a continuous loop where design assumptions are validated against real-time data, and where developing risks are detected before they become failures.


Wind Hazards: Predicting the Unpredictable

Wind is a leading cause of crane collapses. Engineers know the mathematics: pressure rises with the square of velocity. A 50 km/h gust exerts twice the force of a 35 km/h breeze.

Most cranes today are fitted with anemometers and alarms, but these are often basic: a single reading at a single point, with alarms sounding when preset thresholds are exceeded. This approach can miss:

  • Local gust variability along a long jib.

  • Interaction with crane orientation (wind hitting the broadside is more critical than aligned wind).

  • Forecasted conditions that could deteriorate within minutes.

Next-generation wind monitoring could include:

  • Multi-point sensor arrays on cranes.

  • Integration with Bureau of Meteorology gust forecasts.

  • AI models predicting when risk thresholds will be exceeded, not just reporting when they are crossed.

  • Automatic crane repositioning to minimise wind exposure.

This transforms alarms from reactive to predictive — the difference between warning after a hazard is present and anticipating before it materialises.


Soil Hazards: Stability Under Load

Ground conditions are another silent but critical hazard. Outriggers may impose hundreds of kilonewtons on pads, meaning even small soil weaknesses can lead to tilting or overturning.

Engineering practice already includes soil investigations: boreholes, CPT, SPT, and FEA models. But these tests capture conditions before installation, not necessarily during operation. Soil strength can change due to rainfall, groundwater shifts, or nearby excavation.

Live soil monitoring can be achieved with:

  • Load cells under mats to track ground reactions.

  • Settlement gauges to detect tilt.

  • Piezometers for pore pressure during rain events.

  • Integrated warnings when ground resistance trends downward.

This approach acknowledges soil as a living hazard that changes daily.


LiDAR and Obstacle Detection: Power Lines and Proximity Hazards

One striking feature of the Derrimut collapse was the crane’s boom striking power lines. Contact with utilities is a recurrent hazard in crane operations worldwide. While operators are trained to maintain exclusion zones, in practice visibility, fatigue, or unexpected boom movement can still lead to contact.

LiDAR scanning offers a solution.

  • How it works: LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) emits laser pulses to map surroundings in 3D with centimetre accuracy. Mounted on a crane, it can create a live digital map of nearby obstacles.

  • Application in cranes:

    • Detecting and mapping power lines, buildings, or scaffolding in the lift path.

    • Setting proximity alarms when a boom, hook, or load approaches a defined clearance.

    • Combining with wind data to predict if gusts could push the load into restricted zones.

In aviation, LiDAR and radar-based systems are standard for obstacle detection. In construction, adoption is patchy. Yet the technology exists, is cost-effective, and could dramatically reduce risks of contact with hazards like live power lines.

LiDAR’s strength lies not only in static mapping but in detecting movement — for example, when a suspended load begins to swing toward a power line due to a gust. This is a quintessential developing hazard, one that static design could never fully capture.


Integrated Hazard Dashboards

Wind, soil, and LiDAR obstacle detection all provide valuable data. But their true power lies in integration. Imagine a crane operator’s cabin equipped with a single dashboard displaying:

  • Wind speeds and gust forecasts, colour-coded for risk.

  • Soil reaction forces under each outrigger, with alerts if settlement is trending.

  • LiDAR mapping of nearby structures and power lines, with real-time clearance zones.

  • Predictive risk models showing probability of instability or contact over the next 30 minutes.

This integration mirrors aviation’s cockpit: multiple inputs fused into actionable guidance. For cranes, such systems could shift the operator’s role from reactive decision-maker to proactive risk manager.


AI as a Predictive Partner

Artificial Intelligence has a natural role in hazard monitoring:

  • Sensor fusion: combining wind, soil, and LiDAR inputs into coherent risk profiles.

  • Prediction: learning from past crane incidents to forecast when risks are likely to escalate.

  • Decision support: providing operators with clear options (“safe to continue lift for 20 minutes” / “halt operations — clearance margin < 1m”).

The challenge is balance. AI should not replace human oversight, but augment it. Over-reliance could create new vulnerabilities if operators become complacent. The design challenge is to build AI into systems that support human judgment rather than substitute for it.


Ethics and Engineering Responsibility

The Derrimut collapse underscores the ethical responsibility of mechanical engineers. Hazard identification is not just a design requirement; it is a matter of public safety. The profession has a duty to anticipate, detect, and control risks wherever possible.

The tools now exist to monitor developing hazards — wind sensors, soil gauges, LiDAR scanners, and AI dashboards. If lives and infrastructure can be protected through wider adoption of these tools, then the question becomes one of responsibility: should they be optional, or mandatory?


Open Questions for the Future

  1. Would integrated live monitoring have reduced the risks at Derrimut?

  2. Should all cranes be fitted with LiDAR obstacle detection as standard?

  3. Do we already have enough technology, but lack regulation and enforcement?

  4. What role should AI play in balancing predictive insight with operator autonomy?


Conclusion

The Derrimut incident remains under investigation. No conclusions can be drawn about its specific cause until findings are published. Yet as a case study, it illustrates the broader point that hazards in crane operations are dynamic. Wind, soil, obstacles, and loads evolve minute by minute.

Mechanical engineers have the tools — wind sensors, soil monitors, LiDAR scanners, integrated dashboards, and AI — to detect these developing hazards. The challenge is to move from a culture of static design assumptions to one of continuous hazard monitoring.

The ultimate professional question is this: If aviation can integrate multiple systems to monitor and predict hazards, why can’t construction do the same for cranes? And if we can, how soon will we accept the ethical responsibility to make it standard?


References and Further Reading

  • ISO 4301 / AS 1418 — Crane standards covering stability and wind.

  • ISO 12480-1:2003 — Safe use of cranes; includes environmental hazard monitoring.

  • WorkSafe Victoria Guidance Notes — Crane safety management.

  • Holický & Retief (2017)Probabilistic treatment of wind action in structural design.

  • Nguyen et al. (2020)Real-time monitoring of crane foundation response under variable soil conditions.

  • Liebherr LICCON — Example of integrated load and geometry monitoring.

  • FAA LLWAS — Aviation’s real-time wind shear alert system, model for construction.

  • Recent research in LiDAR obstacle detection (e.g., IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems) — showing LiDAR’s potential in complex environments.


 

Structural
Drafting
| Mechanical
Drafting
| 3D
Laser Scanning

Mechanical Engineering

Consulting Engineers

 

Maximising Uptime at Transfer Points: How Hamilton By Design Optimises Chutes, Hoppers, and Conveyors for the Mining Industry

In the mining industry, system uptime isn’t just a goal—it’s a necessity. Transfer points such as chutes, hoppers, and conveyors are often the most failure-prone components in processing plants, especially in high-wear environments like HPGR (High Pressure Grinding Rolls) circuits. Abrasive ores, heavy impact, fines accumulation, and moisture can all combine to reduce flow efficiency, damage components, and drive up maintenance costs.

At Hamilton By Design, we help mining clients minimise downtime and extend the life of their material handling systems by applying advanced 3D scanning, DEM simulation, smart material selection, and modular design strategies. This ensures that transfer points operate at peak efficiency—day in, day out.

Here’s how we do it:

Optimised Flow with DEM-Based Chute & Hopper Design

Flow blockages and misaligned velocities are among the biggest contributors to transfer point failure in the mining industry. That’s why we use Discrete Element Method (DEM) simulations to model bulk material flow through chutes, hoppers, and transfer transitions.

Through DEM, we can simulate how different ores—ranging from dry coarse rock to sticky fines—move, compact, and impact structures. This allows us to tailor chute geometry, outlet angles, and flow paths in advance, helping:

  • Prevent material buildup or arching inside hoppers and chutes
  • Align material velocity with the conveyor belt speed using hood & spoon or trumpet-shaped designs
  • Reduce wear by managing trajectory and impact points

Optimised flow equals fewer shutdowns, longer equipment life, and better plant throughput.

Wear-Resistant Liners & Material Engineering

Not all wear is the same—and neither are the materials we use to combat it. By studying the abrasion and impact zones in your chute and hopper systems, we strategically apply wear liners suited to each application.

Our engineering team selects from:

  • AR (Abrasion-Resistant) steels for high-wear areas
  • Ceramic liners in fines-rich or ultra-abrasive streams
  • Rubber liners to absorb shock and reduce noise

This approach reduces liner replacement frequency, improves operational safety, and lowers the risk of unplanned shutdowns at key transfer points.

3. Dust and Spillage Control: Cleaner, Safer Operation

Dust and spillage around conveyors and transfer chutes can lead to extensive cleanup time, increased maintenance, and health hazards. At Hamilton By Design, we treat this as a core design challenge.

We design chutes and hoppers with:

  • Tight flange seals at interface points
  • Enclosed transitions that contain dust at the source
  • Controlled discharge points to reduce turbulent material drops

This reduces environmental risk and contributes to more consistent plant performance—especially in confined or enclosed processing facilities in the mining industry.

4. Modular & Accessible Designs for Faster Maintenance

When liners or components need replacement, every minute counts. That’s why our chute and hopper systems are built with modular sections—each engineered for fast removal and reinstallation.

Key maintenance-driven design features include:

  • Bolt-on panels or slide-in liner segments
  • Accessible inspection doors for safe visual checks
  • Lightweight modular components for easy handling

These details reduce labour time, enhance safety, and keep your plant online longer—especially critical in HPGR zones where throughput is non-stop.

5. Precision 3D Scanning & 3D Modelling for Retrofit Accuracy

One of the most powerful tools we use is 3D scanning. In retrofit or brownfield projects, physical measurements can be inaccurate or outdated. We solve this by conducting detailed laser scans that generate accurate point cloud data—a precise digital twin of your plant environment.

That data is then transformed into clean 3D CAD models, which we use to:

  • Design retrofits that precisely match existing structure
  • Identify interferences or fit-up clashes before fabrication
  • Reduce install time by ensuring right-first-time fits

This scan-to-CAD workflow dramatically reduces rework and error margins during installation, saving time and cost during shutdown windows.

Real-World Application: HPGR & Minerals Transfer Systems

In HPGR-based circuits, transfer points between crushers, screens, and conveyors experience high rates of wear, dust generation, and blockages—particularly where moisture-rich fines are present.

Here’s how Hamilton By Design’s methodology addresses these pain points:

  • DEM-based flow modelling ensures the HPGR discharge flows cleanly into chutes and onto conveyors without buildup.
  • Hood/spoon geometries help track material to belt velocity—minimising belt wear and reducing misalignment.
  • Strategic liner selection extends life in critical wear zones under extreme abrasion.
  • Modular chute designs allow for fast liner swap-outs without major disassembly.
  • 3D scanning & CAD design ensures new chute sections fit seamlessly into existing HPGR and conveyor frameworks.

By designing smarter transfer systems with these technologies, we enable operators to reduce downtime, increase liner life, and protect critical assets in high-throughput mining applications.

Uptime Benefits at a Glance

Performance AreaImpact on Mining Operations
Smooth bulk material flowFewer clogs, improved throughput, longer operating cycles
Velocity-matched dischargeLower conveyor belt wear and downtime
Robust wear protectionLonger life, fewer liner replacements
Modular designFaster maintenance turnarounds during scheduled shutdowns
3D scanning & CAD integrationPrecise fit, reduced installation time, fewer errors during retrofit

Final Word: Engineering That Keeps the Mining Industry Moving

At Hamilton By Design, we combine mechanical engineering expertise with 3D modelling, material flow simulation, and smart fabrication practices to deliver high-performance chute, hopper, and transfer point systems tailored for the mining industry.

Whether you’re dealing with a problematic HPGR discharge, spillage issues, or planning a brownfield upgrade, our integrated design process delivers results that improve reliability, extend service life, and protect uptime where it matters most.

Looking to retrofit or upgrade transfer systems at your site?
Let’s talk. We bring together 3D scanning, DEM modelling, practical engineering, and proven reliability to deliver systems that work—from concept through to install.

Reach out at contact@hamiltonbydesign.com.au

#3DScanning #MiningIndustry #Chutes #Hoppers #TransferPoints #3DModelling #MechanicalEngineering #HPGR #PlantUptime #HamiltonByDesign

Structural Drafting | Mechanical Drafting | 3D Laser Scanning

Mechanical Engineering